StateLevelForest
DatasetThe StateLevelForest
dataset provides a unique view of
total forest area across all states in the United States, spanning over
a century. It includes state-level data from 1907 to 2017, sampled on 11
occasions. It also includes estimated forest cover in 1630, included for
reference, “at the time of European Settlement.” This dataset could be
vital for understanding changes in forest cover over time, how this
impacts ecosystems, ecological communities, and species, and can be
instrumental in research, policy-making, and education.
This dataset is transcribed from the data provided in the following report:
Oswalt, S. N., Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D., & Pugh, S. A. (2019). Table 3. In Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment (pp. 77-78). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. (doi: 10.2737/WO-GTR-97)
Information on the report is available at this link: https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/57903# And a PDF of the report is available at this link: https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/publications/gtr/gtr_wo97.pdf
While the StateLevelForest
dataset is a valuable
resource, users should be aware of several caveats:
Adjustments and Definitions: The data for years 2007 and later are adjusted for forest definition change to a minimum of 10% cover and the removal of chaparral as a forest type.
Historical Data Adjustments: Data for 1909-1997 have been adjusted for the removal of the chaparral type and the addition of historically unproductive forest areas in west Texas and west Oklahoma. 1630 Estimates: The 1630 data are estimated based on the original forest area and historic land clearing information, primarily for reference purposes.
Rounding: Some data may not add up exactly due to rounding in the original calculations. Recommendations for Users
Before using the StateLevelForest
dataset for scientific
research or dissemination, we strongly recommended that users
familiarize themselves with the original report by Oswalt et al. (2019).
Understanding the context, methodology, and limitations of the original
data collection is crucial for accurate interpretation and use of this
dataset.
# Load the StateLevelForest dataset
data("StateLevelForest")
# View the first few rows of the dataset
head(StateLevelForest)
#> year state forest_thousands_of_acres
#> 1 2017 Connecticut 1808
#> 2 2017 Delaware 361
#> 3 2017 Maine 17579
#> 4 2017 Maryland 2463
#> 5 2017 Massachusetts 3025
#> 6 2017 New Hampshire 4758
This example focuses on exploring the change in forest cover in Massachusetts over time, relative to its estimated forest cover in the year 1630. By visualizing these changes, we can gain insights into the environmental shifts and land use changes in Massachusetts.
We begin by filtering the StateLevelForest dataset to include only the data for Massachusetts. The goal is to compare the forest cover in different years with the forest cover in the year 1630, which we use as a baseline. The following steps are taken in the data transformation process:
Using ggplot2, we create a line plot to visualize these changes:
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
MA_cover_relative_to_1630 <- StateLevelForest %>%
filter(state == "Massachusetts") %>%
mutate(X1630 = if_else(year == min(year), forest_thousands_of_acres, 0)) %>%
mutate(X1630 = max(X1630)) %>%
ungroup() %>%
filter(year != min(year))
ggplot(MA_cover_relative_to_1630, aes(x = year, y = forest_thousands_of_acres)) +
geom_hline(aes(yintercept = 0), color = NA, linewidth = 0) +
geom_hline(aes(yintercept = X1630), color = "red", linewidth = 1) +
geom_point() +
geom_line() +
scale_x_continuous(breaks = scales::pretty_breaks()) +
scale_y_continuous(breaks = scales::pretty_breaks()) +
labs(x = "Year", y = "Forest area (in thousands of acres)", title = "Massachusetts") +
theme_minimal() +
theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45, vjust = 0.5),
aspect.ratio = 1)
The plot provides a clear visualization of how forest cover in Massachusetts has changed over time, compared to the baseline year of 1630. The red line representing the 1630 forest cover serves as a constant reference for these changes. By visualizing these data, we can observe trends, identify significant changes, and make informed hypotheses about the factors influencing these changes, or about how forest cover change might be influencing other dynamics.